Studies and Experiments
Sally-Anne Test
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
In 1985, Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan Leslie, and Uta Frith at the MRC Cognitive Development Unit in London adapted Heinz Wimmer and Josef Perner's false-belief puppet paradigm into what became known as the Sally-Anne test. Children watch two dolls, Sally and Anne: Sally hides a marble in her basket and leaves the room, Anne then moves the marble to her own box, and the child is asked where Sally will look for it first. Correctly answering the basket requires representing a belief the child knows to be false, a mental-state inference the researchers took as a marker of theory of mind. Comparing a group of autistic children against mental-age-matched children with Down syndrome and typically developing children, the study found autistic children, despite normal or above-average performance on control questions, failed the belief question far more often than either comparison group. The result, published in the journal Cognition, became a founding demonstration for the theory that autism involves a specific difficulty attributing mental states to others, independent of general intellectual ability.
Facts
Key FindingAutistic children failed the false-belief question far more often than mental-age-matched Down syndrome and typically developing comparison children, despite the autistic group's higher average mental age, showing the deficit was specific to autism rather than general retardation. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
The Sally-Anne test is the founding operationalization of theory of mind as an experimental false-belief task.
Conducted By
In Branch
Sources
1. Baron-Cohen, Leslie & Frith (1985): Does the Autistic Child Have a "Theory of Mind"?
Cognition (Elsevier)Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, abstract and introductionQuote, Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, abstract and introduction
We use a new model of metarepresentational development to predict a cognitive deficit which could explain a crucial component of the social impairment in childhood autism.
View the Source 1. Baron-Cohen, Leslie & Frith (1985): Does the Autistic Child Have a "Theory of Mind"?
Cognition (Elsevier)Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, abstract, direct quote: "Thus the dysfunction we have postulated and demonstrated is independent of mental retardation and specific to autism."Quote, Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, abstract, direct quote: "Thus the dysfunction we have postulated and demonstrated is independent of mental retardation and specific to autism."
Thus the dysfunction we have postulated and demonstrated is independent of mental retardation and specific to autism.
View the Source 1. Baron-Cohen, Leslie & Frith (1985): Does the Autistic Child Have a "Theory of Mind"?
Cognition (Elsevier)Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, title pageQuote, Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, title page
Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"?
View the Source 1. Baron-Cohen, Leslie & Frith (1985): Does the Autistic Child Have a "Theory of Mind"?
Cognition (Elsevier)Conducted By: Simon Baron-Cohen, Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, author bylineQuote, Conducted By: Simon Baron-Cohen, Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, author byline
SIMON BARON-COHEN, ALAN M. LESLIE, UTA FRITH, MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London
View the Source Wikipedia: Sally-Anne Test
Wikimedia FoundationAssociated With: Theory of Mind, Article body, section on the belief question and what passing the test demonstratesQuote, Associated With: Theory of Mind, Article body, section on the belief question and what passing the test demonstrates
Passing the test is thus seen as the manifestation of a participant understanding that Sally has her own beliefs that may not correlate with reality; this is the core requirement of theory of mind.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.