Psychology Atlas

How The Mind Works
Studies and Experiments

Rat Park Experiment

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Bruce Alexander and colleagues at Simon Fraser University built Rat Park, an enriched, socially housed environment for laboratory rats, to test whether earlier addiction studies using isolated caged rats had overstated how purely chemical drug addiction is. The studies, published between 1978 and 1981, remain widely cited outside psychology and are also a standard example of a landmark finding whose own methodology has drawn sustained scrutiny.

Facts
Disputed
Key Finding
Rats housed in Rat Park drank far less morphine-laced water than rats housed alone in standard cages, with isolated males in one condition consuming roughly nineteen times more morphine, suggesting environment and social contact strongly shape drug-seeking behavior rather than the drug alone determining it. 1
The reported difference in morphine consumption is not disputed within Alexander's own data; what is contested is how far the result generalizes, given the study's own small group sizes and a failed 1996 replication attempt.
Study Year
1978 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

Conducted By

In Branch

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Rat Park
Wikimedia FoundationFindings
Quote, Findings
The rats in Rat Park resisted the morphine water. They would try it occasionally—with the females trying it more often than the males—but they showed a statistically significant preference for the plain water.
View the Source
1. Wikipedia: Rat Park
Wikimedia FoundationRat Park experiments section
Quote, Rat Park experiments section
The caged rats (Groups CC and PC) took to the morphine instantly, even with relatively little sweetener, with the caged males drinking 19 times more morphine than the Rat Park males in one of the experimental conditions.
View the Source
1. Wikipedia: Rat Park
Wikimedia FoundationReplication section
Quote, Replication section
There has been little subsequent interest in replicating the studies due to several methodological issues present in the originals.
View the Source
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Key Finding

Bruce Petrie's 1996 replication attempt could not reproduce the original Rat Park results. Critics have also pointed to the small group sizes (eight rats per condition), the use of orally administered, sweetened morphine that does not mirror typical drug-use patterns, and equipment failures and lost data in the original studies. Researchers now generally treat environment as a contributing factor in addiction rather than the sole determinant the study is popularly credited with proving.

A dissenting reading, from Bruce PetrieWikipedia: Rat Park, Wikimedia Foundation

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.